Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Susan Linehan's avatar

The thing that bugs me about the coverage of the Chevron Defense is how many people think the deference is absolute. "So long as the interpretation is reasonable" is the critical part. There are already lots of avenues for litigants to challenge administrative decisions in the courts, ALJs or even more. In fact, the fishing boat litigant seems to have done so: I understand the the fee he objected to has actually been dropped in his case.

The folks litigating "on behalf" of the fisherman are indeed doing no such thing. They are litigating on behalf of an agenda.

It's too much to hope that the Extremes should just modify the concept, to add better ways to challenge an administrative decision on existing reasons for challenge. If it isn't true already, awarding attorney fees to a prevailing litigant could allow greater access to using the existing exceptions to deference.

In other words, to freaking BALANCE the "unaccountable" agency's expertise with some further accountability in the courts, rather than let judges simple pontificate on issues of expertise they know nothing about.

Expand full comment
Mark F. Buckley's avatar

Unitary Executive=King George, who never asks. He takes. Back in the early 80s, exiled Iranian President Abolhassan Banisadr routinely appeared on French network television, signed paperwork (earlier agreement) from the Carter Administration in hand, to inform us that George Bush (and earlier, Bill Casey) had furtively met with the ayatollahs (same hotel that Kissinger used, to disrupt the Vietnam peace talks) in order to convince them to delay release of the embassy hostages until after the election so that Carter would lose. The clerics were only too happy to agree, because they hated Jimmy Carter for feting the Shah (an American puppet) at WH state dinners. The hostages were released ten minutes after the conclusion of Reagan's inaugural address. In return, Gipper sold TOW and Hawk missiles (through Jerusalem, of all places) to the nation his own State Dept had listed as the primary sponsor of international terrorism. Never told Congress.

Expand full comment
7 more comments...

No posts