Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Christopher Sheahen's avatar

Thank you for a detailed overview of the Slaughterhouse cases, and how it relates to Reconstruction. Another example of why your posts are so important.

The tips on using the Court’s website are a welcome bonus.

Expand full comment
Jane L Scarborough's avatar

I was pleased to read your ONE FIRST entry about the Slaughterhouse Cases, and the Court's gutting of the Privileges and Immunities Clause. I gave a talk a number of years ago at the Maine Law School, subsequently published in their Law Review, using the Slaughterhouse Cases as the subject of a counter-factual history, "What If the Butchers in The Slaughter House Cases Had Won?: An Exercise in "Counterfactual Doctrine." Since in his Dobbs concurrence, Justice Thomas called for the Court to correct its erroneous decisions based on "the fundamental right to privacy," perhaps he can also urge the Court to overturn the Slaughterhouse Cases. Thomas has, in the past, actually endorsed such a position (one of the few times we have ever agreed), but seemingly with no takers. But now that he is in the catbird seat with the current Court, it probably will be on a "relist" in the not too distant future. If you or any of your readers are interested in reading my counter-factual Slaughterhouse Cases outcome, here is the cite: Scarborough, "What If the Butchers in The Slaughter House Cases Had Won?: An Exercise in "Counterfactual" Doctrine, 50 Me. L. Rev. 211 (1998).

Expand full comment
3 more comments...

No posts