To be clear, that's no reason not to continue to make substantive criticisms about things like the shadow docket the same way one should critisize a president of the other party. But I get this sense from your writing that you don't just see this court as an unfortunate choice but as somehow not a legitimate exercise of the political pow…
To be clear, that's no reason not to continue to make substantive criticisms about things like the shadow docket the same way one should critisize a president of the other party. But I get this sense from your writing that you don't just see this court as an unfortunate choice but as somehow not a legitimate exercise of the political power of the people who made the appointment of these justices a priority
But maybe Twitter is just damaging my brain.
(and yes politics is supposed to give people who focus on a single issue more influence on that than those who spread their concerns out over many issues..think of it as spending your voting points on one issue or diversifying).
To be clear, that's no reason not to continue to make substantive criticisms about things like the shadow docket the same way one should critisize a president of the other party. But I get this sense from your writing that you don't just see this court as an unfortunate choice but as somehow not a legitimate exercise of the political power of the people who made the appointment of these justices a priority
But maybe Twitter is just damaging my brain.
(and yes politics is supposed to give people who focus on a single issue more influence on that than those who spread their concerns out over many issues..think of it as spending your voting points on one issue or diversifying).