The SCOTUS trivia section was very interesting. In a post-Trump scenario that (hopefully) does not end in creeping authoritarianism or full-on dictatorship :) , do you think it would be prudent to enshrine the original standard that Washington obeyed into the Constitution via constitutional amendment to prevent abuses?
The SCOTUS trivia section was very interesting. In a post-Trump scenario that (hopefully) does not end in creeping authoritarianism or full-on dictatorship :) , do you think it would be prudent to enshrine the original standard that Washington obeyed into the Constitution via constitutional amendment to prevent abuses?
The SCOTUS trivia section was very interesting. In a post-Trump scenario that (hopefully) does not end in creeping authoritarianism or full-on dictatorship :) , do you think it would be prudent to enshrine the original standard that Washington obeyed into the Constitution via constitutional amendment to prevent abuses?
What would the arguments be against it, if not?